Food and Ag Agencies Plan to Cut Billions from Research, Conservation, and More | Civil Eats STAGING
A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

Food and Ag Agencies Plan to Cut Billions from Research, Conservation, and More

Mothers and children using the WIC program would also get fewer dollars to spend on fresh fruits and vegetables.

June 2, 2025 – Over the weekend, the three agencies that have the most impact on the American food system released more details on how they would cut spending to align with the broader budget President Trump outlined for fiscal year 2026.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

The details were outlined in budget proposals released by each agency. They are not final: Congress still has to appropriate the funds. Also, these budgets are separate from the budget reconciliation bill currently being considered by the Senate; however, the documents further reveal the scale of the Trump administration’s plans to cut back on farm-conservation work, food and farm research, and enforcement of environmental laws.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) budget would cut spending by more than half, from $9.1 billion to $4.2 billion. (Over the past decade, the lowest it ever reached was $8.1 billion.) Spending cuts that could impact the food system include nearly $2 billion from a pair of programs that send money to states to help communities clean up contaminated drinking water and prevent runoff into local waterways; some of that pollution comes from agriculture and food processing. In the document, the EPA says it is “encouraging states to take responsibility of funding their own water infrastructure projects.”

The agency also proposes completely eliminating $1.4 billion in grant programs that fund projects on topics including pesticides and pollution prevention, and it cuts $61 million from money used to enforce environmental laws. In a press release, the Environmental Protection Network, an advocacy organization, said that the 49 percent cut to enforcement would undermine “the agency’s ability to uphold the nation’s environmental laws and protect public health.”

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

At the Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. proposed cutting $17 billion in research funding at the National Institutes of Health, $400 million from the Food and Drug Administration, and $550 million from the Centers for Disease Control. In addition to eliminating thousands of jobs, the budget proposal says the agency is “terminating, de-scoping or non-renewing over 5,000 contracts, resulting in significant savings.” It proposes allocating $500 million to a new “MAHA Initiative,” which will now also house programs dedicated to Alzheimer’s disease and childhood lead poisoning prevention that were formerly run by the CDC.

Given the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) broad reach, its proposed cuts would likely have the biggest immediate impact on farmers and eaters. The agency is proposing a $6.7 billion cut in discretionary spending across the board, including a whopping $784 million from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), where funds would drop from $896 million to $112 million. The savings mainly come from eliminating discretionary funds for conservation technical assistance, a term for USDA employees who help farmers do things like plant cover crops and install fencing. In the document, the agency says the NRCS will fund technical assistance through other sources and operate “with efficiencies that reflect greater reliance on state and local conservation districts.”

The USDA’s budget also zeros out future funding for the popular McGovern-Dole international food aid program which buys food from American farms for school meals in low-income countries. It cuts $600 million in research funding for the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and proposes rolling back a pandemic-era change to the Supplemental Assistance Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) that allowed families to buy more fruits and vegetables.

In an emailed statement, National WIC Association president Georgia Machell said the change would lead to a drop in average monthly benefits from $54 to $13 for breastfeeding mothers and $27 to $10 for young children. “Reducing the [benefit] significantly hinders access to fruits and vegetables for low-income mothers and young children at nutritional risk, the very populations this program was designed to protect,” she said. (Link to this post.)

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

Support Civil Eats during NewsMatch

Stories change how we see food — and how we act on it.

From farmworkers to policymakers, Civil Eats lifts up the people building a better food system.

Your gift this season will be doubled through NewsMatch, fueling independent journalism that’s hopeful, honest, and free for all.

Together, we can keep these stories alive — and keep the movement growing.

Give Today.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.


Warning: Undefined variable $aria_req in /srv/users/civileats/apps/civileats/public/wp-content/themes/CivilEats/comments.php on line 16

Warning: Undefined variable $aria_req in /srv/users/civileats/apps/civileats/public/wp-content/themes/CivilEats/comments.php on line 21

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Paulina Velasco from the Institute for Nonprofit News moderated a discussion with Brian Calvert, senior editor, Lisa Held, senior staff reporter and contributing editor, and Matt Wheeland, operations director.

Inside the Food Policy Tracker

At our latest Civil Eats virtual salon, our team talked about the launch and evolution of the Tracker, a running report on federal actions that affect food and agriculture.

Popular

Can This Baltimore Academy Continue to Train Urban Farmers?

Denzel Mitchell at Black Butterfly Teaching Farm. (Photo credit: Sam Delgado)

Department of Labor Suspends Protections for H-2A Guest Workers and Announces Plan to Bring in More

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

USDA Cancels Additional Grants Funding Land Access and Training for Young Farmers

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

Republicans Can’t Shift SNAP Costs to States, According to Senate Official

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions