House Republicans Want the FDA—Not States—to Regulate Food Dyes | Civil Eats STAGING
A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

House Republicans Want the FDA—Not States—to Regulate Food Dyes

Members of the House Appropriations Committee are also asking the agency to submit its review of food additives. 

June 20, 2025 – Since his confirmation as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has enthusiastically supported state laws banning artificial food dyes. In March, for example, he traveled to West Virginia to celebrate the first state bill eliminating the dyes from all foods (starting in 2028).

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

Now, some Republicans in Congress are quietly pushing back on those efforts.

The House Appropriations Committee’s subcommittee responsible for funding the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) submitted a report to explain decisions made in their draft funding bill earlier this month.

“The Committee is concerned that state legislative activity to ban FDA-approved food and color additives threatens both the FDA’s unified, science-based federal food safety system and the interstate commerce of agricultural, food, and beverage goods,” they wrote on page 83 of the report.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

The committee members said they were reaffirming “the essential role FDA plays in determining the safety of food and color additives in the nation’s food and beverage supply.” They also requested that the agency provide a report to the committee detailing the additives FDA is reviewing, including safety concerns.

The language suggests that there may be tension within the party around how exactly the regulation of food dyes should happen, which could impact whether Kennedy is able to eventually get the additives out of the food supply.

While Kennedy has made the issue one of the FDA’s top priorities, his recent announcement on the phaseout of food dyes depends entirely on companies voluntarily removing the dyes from their products. Since then, a handful of companies have committed to doing so. Kraft Heinz announced this week it will remove artificial dyes from its products, including Jell-O and Kool-Aid, and General Mills agreed to remove dyes from its products by 2027. However, many companies who made similar commitments about a decade ago, when attention to food dyes’ health impacts was similarly high, reneged on those promises once attention waned.

Because the FDA has declined to outright ban the dyes—with the exception of Red Dye No. 3, which the Biden administration banned—states have moved to fill the gap with their own laws.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

In April, in response to the agency’s announcement asking industry to voluntarily remove the dyes, Consumer Brands, the trade organization that represents the country’s biggest food companies, issued a statement defending the additives’ safety. The statement also included many of the same points included in the Appropriations Committee report, including concerns about a “state patchwork” of different laws. “Consumer Brands has long asked HHS and FDA to reestablish themselves as the country’s leading regulatory authority, and we appreciate that the administration has reasserted their leadership in response to the myriad of state activity in the food regulation space,” it read. (Link to this post.)

Support Civil Eats during NewsMatch

Stories change how we see food — and how we act on it.

From farmworkers to policymakers, Civil Eats lifts up the people building a better food system.

Your gift this season will be doubled through NewsMatch, fueling independent journalism that’s hopeful, honest, and free for all.

Together, we can keep these stories alive — and keep the movement growing.

Give Today.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.


Warning: Undefined variable $aria_req in /srv/users/civileats/apps/civileats/public/wp-content/themes/CivilEats/comments.php on line 16

Warning: Undefined variable $aria_req in /srv/users/civileats/apps/civileats/public/wp-content/themes/CivilEats/comments.php on line 21

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Paulina Velasco from the Institute for Nonprofit News moderated a discussion with Brian Calvert, senior editor, Lisa Held, senior staff reporter and contributing editor, and Matt Wheeland, operations director.

Inside the Food Policy Tracker

At our latest Civil Eats virtual salon, our team talked about the launch and evolution of the Tracker, a running report on federal actions that affect food and agriculture.

Popular

Can This Baltimore Academy Continue to Train Urban Farmers?

Denzel Mitchell at Black Butterfly Teaching Farm. (Photo credit: Sam Delgado)

Department of Labor Suspends Protections for H-2A Guest Workers and Announces Plan to Bring in More

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

USDA Cancels Additional Grants Funding Land Access and Training for Young Farmers

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

Republicans Can’t Shift SNAP Costs to States, According to Senate Official

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions