Republicans Can’t Shift SNAP Costs to States, According to Senate Official | Civil Eats STAGING
A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

Republicans Can’t Shift SNAP Costs to States, According to Senate Official

Lawmakers were relying on the shift—which risked the loss of food aid for millions of Americans—as a major source of spending cuts.

June 24, 2025 Update: Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Arkansas) announced today that the parliamentarian approved Republicans’ plans to shift SNAP benefit costs to states after lawmakers made small changes to how the proportion that states will be required to pay is calculated.

Unlock the Full Story with a Civil Eats Membership

Expand your understanding of food systems as a Civil Eats member. Enjoy unlimited access to our groundbreaking reporting, engage with experts, and connect with a community of changemakers.

Join today

June 23, 2025 – One of the most controversial provisions related to food and agriculture in the Republicans’ “One Big Beautiful Bill” is now off the table.

Late Friday, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled that plans to shift a significant portion of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit costs onto states violated a Congressional rule. MacDonough also axed a provision that would have made certain groups of non-citizens, such as refugees, ineligible for benefits. (Undocumented immigrants are already ineligible.)

Republican lawmakers had hoped federal dollars saved in the SNAP shift would offset some of the billions that would go to tax cuts. Analysts warned, however, that it would also mean millions of Americans would lose access to food aid, and would be a major budgetary challenge for states.

The so-called Byrd Rule determines what lawmakers can and can’t include in the process of budget reconciliation, which they are currently using to move their tax bill without the threat of a Democratic filibuster. The nonpartisan parliamentarian is responsible for evaluating each provision to make sure it complies with the rule.

banner showing a radar tracking screen and the words

It is unclear how the Senate Agriculture Committee will proceed, as Republicans across Congress are under immense pressure from President Donald Trump to cut spending in order to pay for the extension of tax cuts for wealthier households and increased spending for military, immigration enforcement, and commodity farms. Congress was aiming to get the bill to the president by the July 4 holiday.

“We are continuing to examine options that comply with Senate rules to achieve savings through budget reconciliation to ensure SNAP serves those who truly need it while being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars,” Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Arkansas) said in a statement.

The committee’s plan to tighten work requirements, which would ultimately push many people out of the program, was not found to violate the rule.

As the process continues, Democrats in Congress will be paying close attention. Since the suite of cuts was first proposed, they have been fighting back on several fronts. They’ve held press conferences, shadow hearings, and roundtables to draw attention to the potential impacts of cuts on American families, farmers, and rural economies.

Last week, Senate Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota) and Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) sent a letter to Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) urging him to change course on the food assistance provisions.

We’ll bring the news to you.

Get the weekly Civil Eats newsletter, delivered to your inbox.

“While Republicans’ proposed cuts to SNAP will still be devastating to families, farmers, and independent grocers across the country, we will keep fighting to protect families in need,” Klobuchar said in a statement following the parliamentarian’s decision. “Instead of a rushed partisan process, Republicans should work with us to lower costs for Americans and pass a bipartisan Farm Bill that works for all farmers and rural America.” (Link to this post.)

Support Civil Eats during NewsMatch

Stories change how we see food — and how we act on it.

From farmworkers to policymakers, Civil Eats lifts up the people building a better food system.

Your gift this season will be doubled through NewsMatch, fueling independent journalism that’s hopeful, honest, and free for all.

Together, we can keep these stories alive — and keep the movement growing.

Give Today.

Civil Eats Supporting Membership $60/year $6/month
Give One, Get One Membership $100/year
Learn more about our membership program

Lisa Held is Civil Eats’ senior staff reporter and contributing editor. Read more >

Like the story?
Join the conversation.


Warning: Undefined variable $aria_req in /srv/users/civileats/apps/civileats/public/wp-content/themes/CivilEats/comments.php on line 16

Warning: Undefined variable $aria_req in /srv/users/civileats/apps/civileats/public/wp-content/themes/CivilEats/comments.php on line 21

More from

Food Policy Tracker

Featured

Paulina Velasco from the Institute for Nonprofit News moderated a discussion with Brian Calvert, senior editor, Lisa Held, senior staff reporter and contributing editor, and Matt Wheeland, operations director.

Inside the Food Policy Tracker

At our latest Civil Eats virtual salon, our team talked about the launch and evolution of the Tracker, a running report on federal actions that affect food and agriculture.

Popular

Can This Baltimore Academy Continue to Train Urban Farmers?

Denzel Mitchell at Black Butterfly Teaching Farm. (Photo credit: Sam Delgado)

Department of Labor Suspends Protections for H-2A Guest Workers and Announces Plan to Bring in More

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

USDA Cancels Additional Grants Funding Land Access and Training for Young Farmers

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions

House Republicans Want the FDA—Not States—to Regulate Food Dyes

A logo showing the Civil Eats Food Policy Tracker, looking like a radar following food policy proposals and actions